12.11.07
RUMAHSEHAT Science vs Pseudoscience?
Ini menyambung tudingan mal-praktek yg SANGAT TIDAK BERALASAN.
Ini definisi science dari wikipedia :
Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. It is based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.[1] A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.[2]
Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methodologies of knowledge. Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies to test these hypotheses. These steps must be repeatable in order to predict dependably any future results. Theories that encompass wider domains of inquiry may bind many hypotheses together in a coherent structure. This in turn may help form new hypotheses or place groups of hypotheses into context.
Among other facets shared by the various fields of inquiry is the conviction that the process must be objective to reduce a biased interpretation of the results. Another basic expectation is to document, archive and share all data and methodology so it is available for careful scrutiny by other scientists, thereby allowing other researchers the opportunity to verify results by attempting to reproduce them. This practice, called full disclosure, also allows statistical measures of the reliability of these data to be established.
Dan ini definisi pseudoscience dr wikipedia :
Pseudoscience is any body of knowledge, methodology, belief, or practice that claims to be scientific or is made to appear scientific, but does not adhere to the basic requirements of the scientific method.[2][3][4][5]
The term pseudoscience is based on the Greek root pseudo- (false or pretending) and science (derived from Latin scientia, meaning knowledge). An early recorded use was in 1843 by French physiologist François Magendie[1] considered a pioneer in experimental physiology.
The term has negative connotations, because it is used to indicate that subjects so labeled are inaccurately or deceptively portrayed as science.[6] Accordingly, those labeled as practicing or advocating a “pseudoscience” normally reject this classification.
As it is taught in certain introductory science classes, pseudoscience is any subject that appears superficially to be scientific or whose proponents state is scientific but nevertheless contravenes the testability requirement, or substantially deviates from other fundamental aspects of the scientific method.[7] Professor Paul DeHart Hurd[8] argued that a large part of gaining scientific literacy is “being able to distinguish science from pseudo-science such as astrology, quackery, the occult, and superstition“.[9] Certain introductory survey classes in science take careful pains to delineate the objections scientists and skeptics have to practices that make direct claims contradicted by the scientific discipline in question.[10]
Beyond the initial introductory analyses offered in science classes, there is some epistemological disagreement about whether it is possible to distinguish “science” from “pseudoscience” in a reliable and objective way.[11]
Pseudosciences may be characterised by the use of vague, exaggerated or untestable claims, over-reliance on confirmation rather than refutation, lack of openness to testing by other experts, and a lack of progress in theory development.
Terlihat jelas perbedaan keduanya adalah masalah pengujian secara empirik. Pseudoscience sulit dibuktikan dengan standard pembuktian ilmiah. Tetapi tidak menutup kemungkinan bhw pseudoscience dapat pula bermanfaat, hny saja sulit dibuktikan mekanisme kerjanya.
Nah dari definisi ini, RUMAHSEHAT yg diklaim sebagai mal-praktek JELAS TIDAK TERBUKTI. Metode yg digunakan di RUMAHSEHAT mendapat LAB-PROVEN dari Microsoft, Google, BMW dll atas penelitian pada puluhan orang. Hypnotherapy juga diakui seluruh dunia, adalah bagian dari Light Medicine / Holistic yg menakjubkan.
“..as a Practitioner of hypnosis/sophrology, I can tell you that no science so far has succeeded in undertstanding how consciousness really works…. that is why hypnotic suggestions continue to fascinated professionals. into the cognitive field…”
Mari para professionals, be opened minded..! Negara kita jauh tertinggal secara ekonomi…, mosok.. tertinggal juga dari kemajuan teknologi..! Pleeeazze ….!
Hypnotherapy & Brain Entrainment dalam satu gabungan yang dimiliki RUMAHSEHAT yang memiliki hasil uji empirik. Hasil uji berdasarkan standard ilmiah dunia, baik dari ilmuwan maupun medis. Metode ini sudah digunakan oel Dr. Jill Ammon Wexler sejak 35thn yg lalu pada BrainClinic di Silicon Valley. Salah satunya otak sang genius Bill gates dkk!
Jadi sebelah mana mal-prakteknya..? Halo…mari “be mathematical minded”. Rasanya tidak berlebihan apabila kita berjaga agar kebodohan kita tidak tersiar sampai seluruh dunia.
Mohon dibaca “SI PANDIR YG PEDE DAN SI PANDAI YG MINDER” ini adalah dari kumpulan dokter2 HARVARD. Kalo uji coba mereka disangsikan. Cobalah para penuding menantang HARVARD utk LOMBA CERDAS CERMAT.. Who knows you can win.! Olaa.!
Tenang Tante Atty, kita back-up….!
Kelompok orang yg tidak termasuk dalam golongan si Pandir, BELAJAR TERUS ATAU MATI
